Author Archives: kmco

New Notification Requirement for all GIPS Compliant Firms

The GIPS Executive Committee recently implemented a requirement for firms that claim compliance with the GIPS Standards. All firms claiming GIPS compliance must now notify the CFA Institute of their claim of the compliance on an annual basis.

The notification will be done utilizing an online form. Firm name, contact information, and verification status are required. There are also several optional fields to provide the CFA Institute with additional information.

Firm that notify the CFA Institute of their claim of compliance will be listed on the GIPS website, unless they opt out.

This new notification requirement is effective 1/1/2015. Firms have until 6/30/2015 to complete the first annual notification.

We will be happy to provide further information relating to this subject. For more information, contact Thomas A. Peters, Director, Audit & Accounting at tpeters@kmco.com or 215.441.4600.

Newsletter subscription

Related content:

A Reminder of the Changes to Broker-Dealer Reporting

Several years ago, the Securities and Exchange Commission undertook a project to revise the reporting requirements of broker-dealers. As many of our clients are getting ready for their annual audit, we thought now was a good time to revisit the revised reporting requirements for broker-dealers.

In June 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed amendments to Rule 17a-5, Reports to be made by certain brokers and dealers. In July, 2013, the SEC adopted these amendments in an effort to strengthen and clarify broker-dealer annual financial reporting requirements, and also to facilitate the ability of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to implement the oversight of independent public accountants of brokers and dealers.

The PCAOB adopted two attestation standards specifically for broker-dealers, and the SEC has replaced the internal control report requirement with a requirement to file one of two reports: a Compliance Report for carrying broker-dealers or an Exemption Report for non-carrying broker-dealers.

The Compliance Report is required for any broker-dealer that did not claim an exemption from Rule 15c3-3 and focuses on:

  • The broker-dealer’s compliance with the financial responsibility rules
  • Whether the information used to determine compliance with the financial responsibility rules was derived from the books and records of the broker-dealer
  • Whether internal control over compliance with the financial responsibility rules was effective during the most recent fiscal year end and that there were no instances of material weakness.

Non-carrying broker-dealers are required to file an Exemption Report. The Exemption Report applies to any broker-dealer that claims an exemption from Rule 15c3-3 under subparagraph (k). The Exemption Report includes the following assertions of the broker-dealer:

  • A statement that identifies the provisions in paragraph (k) of SEC Rule 15c3-3 under which the broker-dealer claimed an exemption
  • A statement that the broker-dealer met the identified exemption provisions throughout the most recent fiscal year without exception or met the identified exemption provisions throughout the most recent fiscal year except as described in the exemption report
  • A statement, if applicable, that identifies each exception during the most recent fiscal year in meeting the identified exemption provisions and that briefly describes the nature of each exception and the approximate date(s) on which the exception existed.

The broker-dealer’s PCAOB registered independent public accountant is required to perform a review of either the Compliance Report or the Exemption Report and issue a report based on their review.

These reports, along with the audited financial statements and required supplemental information, and the reports of the independent public accountant, are required to be filed within sixty days after the broker-dealer’s fiscal year end with the SEC, the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), and the broker-dealer’s designated examining authority.

Broker-dealers are also required to make notification to the SEC and FINRA regarding their engagement of a PCAOB registered independent public accountant for this year and would need to for each year going forward if the engagement is not reoccurring in nature. This notification is required to be made by the tenth day of the last month of the broker-dealer’s fiscal year end.

We will be happy to provide further information relating to this subject. For more information, contact Francis L. Varanavage, Manager, Audit & Accounting at fvaranavage@kmco.com or 215.441.4600.

Newsletter subscription

Related content:

Kreischer Miller Recognized as a ‘Best of the Best’ Accounting Firm for 2014 by Inside Public Accounting

Kreischer Miller Named to 2014 IPA Best of the Best Kreischer Miller was recently named to INSIDE Public Accounting’s nationwide Best of the Best Firms list for 2014. Kreischer Miller is the only accounting firm in the Greater Philadelphia region to be named as a Best of the Best. It has been named to the list three of the past four years.

The recognition honors 50 CPA firms across the country for their superior financial and operational performance on more than 70 criteria. The right combination of planning, strategy, and execution distinguish Best of the Best firms from among the more than 540 firms that participated in the 24th annual survey and analysis.

“We are honored to be recognized once again by INSIDE Public Accounting as one of the country’s best firms,” said Stephen W. Christian, Managing Director of Kreischer Miller. “Our firm continues to grow as we add quality team members and clients. This success is driven in large part by our commitment to providing exceptional guidance and insight to our clients to help them achieve their business objectives.”

“The IPA Best of the Best firms represent the pinnacle of high-performing accounting firms in the U.S. Each firm demonstrates the right combination of vision, planning, training, and execution to deliver superior performance,” said Michael Platt, Principal of the Platt Group and publisher of the accounting trade publication, INSIDE Public Accounting. “We congratulate Kreischer Miller for being a representative of the best of what the profession has to offer.”

The IPA Best of the Best CPA firms demonstrate long-term consistency and exceptional performance in any economy – up or down. Exceptional client service, commitment to firmwide training, unique benefits for staff and clients, and specialized client focus are all hallmarks of IPA Best of the Best firms.

For a more detailed look at the IPA Best of the Best, click here.

Kreischer Miller Exhibiting at CFA Institute GIPS Standards Annual Conference

CFA Institute GIPS Standards Annual Conference

September 18-19, 2014
Westin Copley Place
Boston, MA

As the finance industry continues to grow more globally interconnected, investors are increasingly seeking standards of investment performance measurement and reporting that are reliable and comparable across markets. The CFA Institute’s GIPS Standards Annual Conference is focused on the implementation and application of the GIPS standards.

Kreischer Miller will once again be exhibiting at this year’s GIPS Standards Annual Conference. Stop by and see us!

More details about the CFA Institute GIPS Standards Annual Conference.

Are Preliminary GIPS Disclosures a Good Idea?

The Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) provide a voluntary framework for investment managers to use in presenting their investment performance. GIPS compliance has become increasingly important, particularly when dealing with institutional investors who often insist upon it.

GIPS verifications test whether a firm has complied with the GIPS composite construction and policy/procedure requirements. It provides an opinion of compliance at a firm level, and does not ensure the accuracy of any specific composite. A deeper composite examination can be performed to provide an opinion on a specific composite.

We live in a fast-paced society in which people want access to information quickly. This puts pressure on operations and performance professionals to provide investment returns shortly after a period end. There are multiple challenges in the process of compiling investment returns, including:

  • Reconciling client accounts
  • Making sure the securities are properly valued
  • Reviewing the accounting records to check that transactions are recorded properly
  • Updating investment performance presentations
  • Reviewing the presentations for compliance with GIPS and regulatory standards

Performing these steps takes time. Suppose the process takes two weeks, but an investment manager wants to issue updated presentations within two days of the period end. Some investment managers, in their efforts to publish performance numbers, skip a few steps and modify their claim of compliance to indicate their returns are preliminary until the underlying data are reconciled. Such disclosures often look like the following:

  • “Preliminary data was used in calculating the current period’s performance”
  • “Returns are preliminary as underlying data are not yet reconciled”
  • “Preliminary data, if so noted, reflects unreconciled data”

This raises the question of whether the practice of preliminary GIPS disclosures is permitted. A firm’s policies and procedures must be designed to calculate and present performance in compliance with the GIPS Standards. The GIPS Standards do not contain provisions allowing firms to conditionally claim compliance. Firms are permitted to use estimates; however, a firm would have to evaluate the final reconciled figures to the estimates.

The GIPS Standards contain error correction provisions which would apply if the final figures are different than the estimates. For material errors, the firm would need to correct the returns, add disclosures about the correction to the presentation, and provide corrected copies to everyone who received a presentation with an error.

As an extension of the concept of preliminary disclosures, some investment managers have modified their GIPS claim of compliance to indicate that their returns are preliminary until their firm’s verification (and potentially composite examination) is completed. Such disclosures often look like the following:

  • “Returns are preliminary until our firm-wide verification is completed by (add name of verifier here)”
  • “Performance returns are considered preliminary until examined according to GIPS for the reporting period”

Although GIPS verification brings additional credibility to the claim of compliance, it is not part of the claim of compliance. Verifiers can act as resources (being mindful not to violate independence concerns), but investment firms have sole responsibility for their GIPS compliance. A firm’s policies and procedures must be designed to calculate and present performance in compliance with the GIPS Standards. The standards do not contain provisions allowing firms to conditionally claim compliance. The investment manager’s error correction policies apply here as well.

Given that error correction can be a painful and tedious process, it may be prudent to wait until the period end closing process is completed before publishing updated performance presentations.

We will be happy to provide further information relating to this subject. For more information, contact Thomas A. Peters, Director, Audit & Accounting at tpeters@kmco.com or 215.441.4600.

Newsletter subscription

Related content:

Three Options If You Miss an FBAR Filing Requirement

Over the last several years, the IRS has placed a high priority on stopping offshore tax cheating and bringing individuals back into the tax system. Ongoing efforts by the IRS, as well as the Department of Justice, have raised awareness of tax and information reporting requirements for non-U.S. investments.

For instance, you are required to file an FBAR (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts) if you have a financial interest in, signature authority, or other authority over foreign financial accounts whose aggregate value exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year.

A foreign financial account is defined as a financial account located outside the U.S. and includes securities, brokerage, savings, demand, checking, deposit, time deposit, or other accounts maintained with a financial institution. It can also include a commodity futures or options account, an insurance policy or annuity policy with a cash value, or shares in a mutual fund or similar pooled fund. A debit card account is also treated as a financial account, as is a credit card account under certain circumstances.

The FBAR is due by June 30 following the calendar year for which it applies. Thus, FBARS for the 2013 calendar year were due on or before June 30, 2014.

If you or your client did not file an FBAR when it was required, you can take advantage of voluntary disclosure programs. Originally established in 2009, these programs are designed to encourage taxpayers to come forward and become current in their FBAR filings and to pay their tax liabilities. They have resulted in more than 45,000 voluntary disclosures from individuals who have paid over $6.5 billion in back taxes, interest, and penalties.

The IRS offers three voluntary disclosure options:

  1. Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program
  2. Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures
  3. Delinquent FBAR submission procedures

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program

The Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) is designed for taxpayers with exposure to potential criminal liability and/or substantial civil penalties due to a willful failure to report foreign financial assets and pay all tax due with respect to those assets. OVDP provides protection from criminal liability and terms for resolving civil tax and penalty obligations. In addition to the penalties that can be assessed on the tax on the unreported income, there will be an offshore penalty from 27.5 percent to 50 percent of the highest aggregate value of the foreign financial assets in the unreported accounts.

Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures

Streamlined filing compliance procedures are available to taxpayers who certify that their failure to report foreign financial assets and pay all tax due in respect of those assets did not result from willful conduct on their part. They offer a streamlined procedure for filing amended or delinquent returns and terms for resolving tax and penalty obligations. Persons filing under these provisions are subject to an offshore penalty of 5 percent of the highest aggregate value of the foreign financial assets in the unreported accounts.

Delinquent FBAR submission procedures

Taxpayers who have not filed a required FBAR, are not under a civil examination or a criminal investigation by the IRS, and have not already been contacted by the IRS about the delinquent FBARs should file the delinquent FBARs and include a statement explaining why the FBARs are filed late. The IRS will not impose a penalty if you properly reported on your U.S. tax returns, and paid all tax on, the income from the foreign financial accounts reported on the delinquent FBARs.

If you or a client has not filed required FBARs in the past, now is the time to come forward. Although the penalties are stiff under the OVDP program, they will be much worse if the IRS notifies you and they may include jail time. Please contact us to discuss the options that may be best suited for your circumstances.

We will be happy to provide further information relating to this subject. For more information, contact Richard J. Nelson, Director, Tax Strategies at rnelson@kmco.com or 215.441.4600.

Newsletter subscription

The Keys to Effective Operational Due Diligence [presentation]

Operational risk involves many qualitative elements such as an investment manager’s controls, design and implementation of systems, and oversight of employees. It is considered an uncompensated business risk because taking on additional risk of this nature is never expected to improve returns. Implementing a strong operational due diligence process creates an opportunity to strengthen internal systems and procedures and implement safeguards that preserve the investment mandate and minimize uncompensated risks.

In this presentation from a recent industry conference, Thomas A. Peters reviewed the causes of investment mandate violations and increased risk as well as the objectives of operational due diligence. He also outlined the due diligence process and discussed samples of past findings in operational risk assessments.

View the slides from the presentation.

We will be happy to provide further information relating to this subject. For more information, contact Thomas A. Peters, Director, Audit & Accounting at tpeters@kmco.com or 215.441.4600.

Newsletter subscription

Related content:

An Update to 408(b)(2) and Its Impact on Investment Advisors

The Department of Labor (DOL) recently put forth a proposed amendment to its rule, Reasonable Contract or Arrangement Under Section 408(b)(2) – Fee Disclosure, which initially became effective July 1, 2012.

Under the original rule, covered service providers were required to provide certain disclosures, some of which are described in the bullets below, to plan fiduciaries. Covered services providers are any providers of certain services described in the rule that expect to receive $1,000 or more in compensation. See our previous article for more information.

In addition to carrying forward the disclosures required by the rule, the DOL’s proposed amendment would require covered service providers to include a “guide” to assist plan fiduciaries in their review of information. This guide would be required when disclosures are contained in multiple or lengthy documents. The definition of a lengthy document is currently open for interpretation and the DOL is seeking public comment on the specific number of pages for which this guide would be required.

If a guide is required, a covered service provider must disclose the location, either with a specific page or some other general alternative, of where the following required descriptions are contained:

  • Services to be provided
  • All direct compensation
  • All indirect compensation
  • Any compensation that will be paid among related parties
  • Any compensation for termination of the contract or arrangement
  • All compensation for recordkeeping services
  • Any compensation, annual operating expenses, and ongoing expenses

In addition to this information, the guide must identify a person or office, including contact information, which a plan fiduciary may use. Also, covered service providers must state whether they will provide services as a fiduciary, registered investment advisor, or both. The guide must be furnished as a separate document and changes to the information in the guide must be disclosed at least annually to plan fiduciaries.

The amendment is open for public comment until June 10, 2014. Written comments may be submitted by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at regulations.gov and following the instructions for submitting comments.

The rule will not take effect until 12 months after publication of a final amendment. Based on the comment period end date, that should be sometime in 2015.

We will be happy to provide further information relating to this subject. For more information, contact Craig B. Evans, Manager, Audit & Accounting and member of Kreischer Miller’s Investment Industry Group at cevans@kmco.com or 215.441.4600.

Newsletter subscription

Related Content:

Kreischer Miller Exhibiting at PMAR XII

The Journal of Performance Measurement’s Twelth Annual Performance Measurement, Attribution & Risk Conference PMAR XII

May 21-22, 2014
The Westin
Philadelphia, PA

Each year, the PMAR conference provides an opportunity for performance measurement professionals to learn about recent developments in performance, attribution, risk, and GIPS, as well as network with peers and gain new insights and solutions.

Kreischer Miller will once again be exhibiting at this year’s PMAR Conference.  Stop by and see us!

More details about PMAR XII.

 

Kreischer Miller Exhibiting at ICI General Membership Meeting

Investment Company Institute
2014 General Membership Meeting

May 20-22, 2014
Washington Hilton
Washington, DC

Sponsored by the Investment Company Institute, the General Membership Meeting provides a forum for industry executives to discuss key issues, feature industry leaders, and welcome international investment colleagues.  Service providers and the press are important parts of each event.

Kreischer Miller will once again be exhibiting at this year’s ICI General Membership Meeting.  Stop by and see us!

More details about the ICI General Membership Meeting.

Newsletter Signup